EBM WEEKEND READ- BRAD ADAMS
Volkswagen reclaimed the top position in China at the beginning of 2026. It did so while selling dramatically fewer cars.
The German group delivered 4.13 million vehicles worldwide during the first half of the year, 6.3% fewer than in the same period of 2025. Its Chinese sales fell 25.9%, with the decline accelerating to 36.6% in the second quarter.
Join The European Business Briefing
New subscribers this quarter are entered into a draw to win a Rolex Submariner. Join 40,000+ founders, investors and executives who read EBM every day.
SubscribeYet during January and February, Volkswagen held 13.9% of China’s passenger-car market, placing it ahead of Geely, Toyota and a sharply weakened BYD.
The apparent contradiction explains what has happened to Europe’s largest industrial company. Volkswagen did not mount a meaningful recovery in China. It briefly became the largest participant in a market that was contracting even faster than its own sales.
China’s passenger-car market fell by around 20% in the first half of the year after Beijing allowed electric-vehicle tax incentives to expire and reduced its support for trade-in programmes. BYD suffered particularly heavily, allowing Volkswagen to recover the top ranking despite its own steep decline.
For a company that built much of its modern prosperity on China, this is more than a difficult sales cycle. It marks the breakdown of the business model that allowed Chinese profits to support Volkswagen’s sprawling and expensive European manufacturing operation.
The consequences are now arriving in Lower Saxony.
The decades when China paid for everything
It is difficult to overstate the importance of China to Volkswagen.
The company was the first major Western carmaker to establish a significant presence in the country, forming its Shanghai joint venture in 1984. For a generation, the Volkswagen Santana became to Chinese motoring what the Model T had once been to the United States: widely recognised, domestically assembled and closely associated with the arrival of mass car ownership.
Volkswagen was China’s best-selling automotive brand from at least 2008. At its peak, the country accounted for roughly four out of every ten vehicles the group sold worldwide. Audi and Porsche benefited from the same expansion, establishing themselves among China’s rapidly growing class of affluent consumers.
The Chinese operation provided Volkswagen with more than volume. It generated the profits needed to sustain a costly European industrial structure.
The group’s German operations carried high labour costs, a complicated portfolio of brands and models, and manufacturing plants that were politically and operationally difficult to shrink. Strong Chinese earnings helped make those burdens manageable.
China, in effect, subsidised Wolfsburg.
For two decades, Volkswagen’s decisions about employment, investment and production capacity were based on the assumption that the Chinese contribution would continue. The group could maintain a large German workforce and an unusually broad product range because its Chinese joint ventures supplied growth and margin.
That assumption no longer holds.
BYD overtook Volkswagen as China’s best-selling automotive brand in 2024, ending a leadership run that had lasted at least 15 years. In 2025, Geely pushed Volkswagen into third place, while the German group’s two main joint ventures saw their combined retail-market share fall from 12.2% to 10.9%.
The deeper change is visible across the entire industry. Foreign manufacturers once controlled more than 60% of the Chinese car market. Domestic brands now account for more than two-thirds of sales.
Volkswagen has not merely lost ground to one unusually successful rival. The market has shifted decisively towards Chinese manufacturers.
Why the reversal happened so quickly
Volkswagen’s decline in China resulted from three strategic failures that reinforced one another: software, electrification and cost.
The first was software.
Volkswagen committed billions of euros to building an in-house software capability, but the programme repeatedly suffered delays and organisational problems. That mattered everywhere, but nowhere more than in China.
Chinese consumers increasingly evaluate cars as technology products. The quality of the screen, operating system, voice assistant, connectivity and update cycle can matter as much as the engine, chassis or perceived durability.
Volkswagen remained highly capable at building conventional cars. But in a market where buyers expected rapid software improvements and seamless digital features, that was no longer enough.
A well-engineered vehicle with an outdated interface became difficult to sell, particularly when Chinese competitors offered more advanced technology at a lower price.
The second failure was electrification.
Volkswagen’s ID range was developed around a common platform intended to work across several brands and international markets. The approach promised scale, but it also produced complexity and slower development.
The vehicles arrived in China just as domestic manufacturers were reducing prices, improving battery performance and updating models at a pace European companies struggled to match.
Volkswagen was not alone in making the wrong assumptions about electric-vehicle demand. European and American manufacturers spent more than $100 billion on EV programmes between 2022 and 2025, often on the expectation that regulation and subsidies would guarantee a rapid transition.
When some mandates were softened and incentives reduced, the factories, supply agreements and development costs remained.
The third failure was cost.
Chinese manufacturers have developed levels of vertical integration that most European groups cannot replicate. Companies such as BYD control large parts of their battery, electronics and component supply chains, reducing costs while accelerating development.
That advantage is no longer confined to China.
Chinese brands have roughly doubled their share of the European market within a year. Stellantis is now selling a Chinese-designed electric car built in Spain at a price around €10,000 below the Volkswagen ID.3.
Volkswagen is therefore facing the same cost pressure in Europe that weakened it in China. Its competitors are following it into its home market with cheaper cars, faster development cycles and increasingly credible brands.
The clearest symbol of the reversal is Volkswagen’s relationship with Xpeng.
The German group is now jointly developing electric vehicles with a Chinese manufacturer founded in 2014, and the first model created through that partnership has entered mass production.
For decades, China’s joint-venture rules were designed partly to encourage the transfer of Western automotive knowledge to local companies. The technological flow is now moving in the opposite direction.
Volkswagen needs Chinese software and development expertise to remain competitive in China. That is not the result of regulation. It is the result of commercial necessity.
The market reversal that put Volkswagen back on top
The beginning of 2026 produced a twist few in the industry expected.
Beijing reduced support for electric-vehicle purchases, allowing tax exemptions to expire and scaling back trade-in subsidies. The Chinese passenger-car market contracted sharply, with sales falling approximately 26% across January and February.
BYD suffered its steepest decline since the pandemic. Its market share fell to 7.1%, pushing the company into fourth place during the period.
Volkswagen, supported by its combustion-engine and hybrid range, suddenly became China’s biggest passenger-car seller again.
The result showed how dependent parts of the Chinese EV market remained on government support. Demand was not invented by policy, but incentives had clearly accelerated purchases and strengthened the economics of switching to electric vehicles.
Once that support was reduced, manufacturers that had benefited most from the EV boom experienced the sharpest correction.
But Volkswagen can take little comfort from the ranking.
The company did not return to first place because Chinese consumers rediscovered its products. It returned because the wider market, and several of its largest competitors, deteriorated more quickly.
Reclaiming the leading position while your own sales are falling by more than a quarter is not a recovery. It is the least damaging position within a severe industry contraction.
By the second quarter, Volkswagen’s Chinese deliveries were down 36.6%.
The group is no longer simply being outcompeted in a growing market. It is attempting to defend its position while the market itself shrinks and domestic manufacturers continue to take share.
The bill arrives in Germany
The financial consequences are increasingly difficult to disguise.
Volkswagen’s first-quarter net profit fell 28% to €1.56 billion on revenue of €75.7 billion. The group acknowledged that declining sales in China and the United States had weighed on deliveries, despite stronger performance in Europe and South America.
American tariffs are expected to cost the company approximately €4 billion annually.
Volkswagen shares reached a 16-year low in June and have lost more than a quarter of their value during 2026.
The restructuring has intensified accordingly.
Volkswagen closed its Dresden production facility last December and had already agreed approximately 50,000 job reductions with German unions. In June, reports suggested that the group was considering a far more aggressive programme involving as many as 100,000 additional job losses.
The reported options included closing plants in Hanover, Zwickau and Emden, as well as Audi’s Neckarsulm facility, while reducing planned investment by 15%.
What emerged from Volkswagen’s board meeting on 10 July was less severe than the most dramatic proposals, but considerably more substantial than a symbolic cost-cutting exercise.
The group announced plans to reduce its model range by as much as half. It also intends to cut annual production capacity to nine million vehicles, compared with its pre-pandemic target of 12 million.
Manufacturing complexity is expected to fall by as much as 75%, while Volkswagen’s Western and Chinese technology teams will be brought closer together.
The company stopped short of confirming a programme of mass plant closures.
That restraint reflects political reality as much as industrial strategy. The state of Lower Saxony retains a blocking stake in Volkswagen, while the IG Metall union has promised to resist plant closures and compulsory redundancies.
Volkswagen knows it has too much capacity. Its political stakeholders are determined to prevent the company from removing it too quickly.
Europe’s industrial dilemma
The confrontation between Volkswagen, Lower Saxony and the unions reflects a wider European problem.
European governments want to protect domestic vehicle manufacturing, preserve high-skilled employment and slow the advance of heavily subsidised Chinese competitors.
Brussels has responded by placing additional tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles.
But trade barriers cannot resolve the underlying cost difference on their own.
Chinese manufacturers are responding by investing in European production, leasing underused factories and forming partnerships with local groups. They can therefore reduce their exposure to tariffs while benefiting from the excess manufacturing capacity European carmakers can no longer fill.
The factories may remain in Europe, but ownership, technology and strategic control are beginning to shift.
Jobs are likely to be lost regardless. The increasingly important question is who will own and operate the plants that survive.
Volkswagen sits at the centre of that transition. It is Europe’s largest carmaker, one of Germany’s most politically important employers and a symbol of the export model that powered the continent’s industrial success.
Its difficulties therefore extend well beyond the future of a single company.
Can Volkswagen recover?
Calling Volkswagen’s current position a downfall would be too simple.
The group remains Europe’s largest automotive manufacturer. It is still the leading foreign carmaker in China, and its sales have grown in Europe and South America. Skoda is performing strongly, while the partnership with Xpeng represents a pragmatic response to Volkswagen’s technological shortcomings.
The group is not facing immediate disappearance.
But it is being forced to become smaller, simpler and less dependent on assumptions formed during the age of Chinese expansion.
Reducing the model range is necessary. So is cutting production complexity. Volkswagen has spent years attempting to serve too many customer groups with too many variations produced across too many facilities.
The problem is that these changes address the company’s internal structure rather than its central strategic weakness.
Volkswagen no longer possesses a market in which it can reliably generate the outsized profits that China once delivered.
Nothing in the current restructuring plan replaces that earnings engine. The plan instead attempts to make Volkswagen small and efficient enough to operate without it.
That is the real transformation taking place.
For two decades, Volkswagen converted Chinese growth into German factories, jobs and production capacity. It must now unwind much of that capacity at the moment when the profits that supported it have disappeared.
The company may survive that process. It may even emerge as a more disciplined and competitive manufacturer.
But the era in which Chinese consumers bought Volkswagens, Audis and Porsches in sufficient numbers to support the group’s European industrial empire is over.
Those customers did not disappear. They found domestic manufacturers offering more technology at a lower price.
Volkswagen can cut models, simplify factories and partner with Chinese technology companies. What it cannot easily do is recreate the market dominance that paid for everything
Related Analysis
