September 3, 2026- EBM Newsdesk Analysis- By Anthony Gill
The European Union has sent one of its clearest signals yet that its relationship with China is moving from economic partnership towards strategic confrontation, with senior trade officials in Beijing demanding that Chinese authorities address an export imbalance Brussels increasingly regards as unsustainable.
The timing matters. European Commission officials are holding talks with their Chinese counterparts in an attempt to find a diplomatic route out of a trade dispute that could escalate sharply this autumn. Denis Redonnet, the EU’s top trade enforcement official and newly appointed point person on China trade policy, is leading the current delegation, while EU trade commissioner Ditte Juul Jorgensen is expected in Beijing later this month. Brussels wants tangible progress before an October deadline.
Join The European Business Briefing
New subscribers this quarter are entered into a draw to win a Rolex Submariner. Join 40,000+ founders, investors and executives who read EBM every day.
SubscribeThe Trade Deficit Is Becoming a Political Problem
The numbers explain why the tone has changed. China’s trade surplus with the EU has continued to widen, while European exporters are struggling to make equivalent gains in the Chinese market.
As EBM reported in its analysis of the China-EU trade deficit, the EU’s goods deficit with China reached €98 billion in the first quarter of 2026, with European exports falling while Chinese imports continued to rise. The underlying problem is not a temporary fluctuation in demand. It increasingly looks like a structural shift in the relationship.
That distinction is crucial. Europe can tolerate a trade deficit when it is accompanied by strong investment, access to markets and reciprocal opportunities. What Brussels increasingly sees instead is European companies losing ground inside China while Chinese manufacturers expand aggressively across European markets.
Brussels Has Finally Lost Patience
The EU’s tougher approach has been building for months. In May, several of Europe’s largest economies demanded a much more aggressive response to Chinese industrial overcapacity, arguing that the bloc could no longer stand by while subsidised Chinese production put European manufacturers under pressure.
EBM’s earlier analysis, Europe’s Largest Economies Are Done Being Polite With China, captured the political shift. France, Spain, Italy, the Netherlands and Lithuania were among those pushing Brussels towards stronger trade-defence measures.
The latest negotiations suggest that pressure is now moving from European capitals directly into the EU-China relationship.
The Automotive Industry Is the Warning
Few industries illustrate the problem better than cars.
Chinese manufacturers have moved rapidly into Europe, combining lower costs, increasingly sophisticated electric vehicles and enormous domestic production capacity. European manufacturers, meanwhile, have struggled with weak Chinese demand, high production costs and the expensive transition towards electric vehicles.
EBM recently examined how Chinese carmakers could capture as much as 30% of the European market by 2035. That possibility is no longer being treated as an outlandish scenario by investors. Chinese brands are already gaining market share, while European manufacturers are under pressure to reduce costs and restructure operations.
The more uncomfortable development is that Chinese companies increasingly do not need to export everything from China. They can build inside Europe.
As EBM reported in August, European carmakers are now opening their factories to Chinese rivals, with Stellantis and other manufacturers exploring arrangements that allow Chinese brands to use underutilised European production capacity.
That is precisely the scenario Brussels wanted to prevent.
Tariffs Alone Will Not Solve It
The EU has already demonstrated that tariffs have limits.
Brussels imposed substantial duties on Chinese electric vehicles in an effort to protect European manufacturers. But the Chinese response has been to adapt rather than retreat. Manufacturers are investing in European production, adjusting supply chains and looking for ways to establish themselves inside the market they are being accused of disrupting.
EBM’s analysis of China Shock 2.0 argued that this second wave is fundamentally different from the manufacturing shock of the early 2000s. This time, Chinese competition is reaching high-value industries including electric vehicles, batteries, solar technology, robotics and other advanced manufacturing sectors.
That makes the political calculation considerably harder.
Beijing Has Its Own Leverage
China is unlikely simply to accept Brussels’ demands.
European industry remains dependent on Chinese supply chains in numerous strategic areas, including critical minerals, components and industrial inputs. Beijing therefore has leverage of its own.
The European Commission knows this. That is why the current talks are less about forcing China into a traditional trade concession and more about whether Beijing can be persuaded to change the direction of the relationship without triggering retaliation.
There are reasons for China to negotiate. Europe remains a wealthy and important market, and Beijing has an interest in preventing a broad escalation of European trade restrictions.
But there is also a fundamental limit to what China can offer. Reducing exports significantly would mean accepting lower utilisation of the industrial capacity that has become one of the country’s greatest economic strengths.
The Bigger Picture
This is no longer simply a dispute about tariffs or the size of a trade deficit. It is a struggle over Europe’s industrial future.
Brussels is discovering that it cannot simultaneously remain completely open to Chinese manufacturing, protect strategic European industries and maintain an enormous trade imbalance indefinitely. Something has to give.
The October deadline therefore matters. If Beijing offers meaningful concessions, Europe may step back from further escalation. If it does not, the EU will have to choose between accepting deeper Chinese penetration of its industrial economy or becoming considerably more protectionist.
EBM’s view is that Europe has already waited too long. The objective should not be a trade war with China. It should be a relationship in which European companies can compete in China on something approaching equal terms while Chinese companies compete in Europe under the same rules.
If Beijing cannot offer that, Brussels is increasingly likely to conclude that confrontation is preferable to continued dependence. And once Europe reaches that conclusion, the China trade relationship will look very different indeed.
