Italy’s political landscape is once again at the centre of a heated debate over economic reform after Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni’s party moved to double the legal limit on cash payments to €10,000. The proposal, put forward in a draft budget amendment that must be approved by December 31, would represent a significant shift in longstanding efforts to curb tax evasion and modernise the country’s financial system.
ft.com
+1
Supporters within Brothers of Italy argue that raising the cap from the current €5,000 threshold would provide greater flexibility for consumers and small businesses, especially in regions where cash remains a dominant mode of payment. Yet critics contend that the move could undermine transparency in financial transactions and embolden the underground economy. This debate over the cash limit ties into broader discussions around Europe’s competitiveness challenges, where regulatory frameworks and market integrity are central to attracting investment and maintaining economic stability.
Currently, Italian law restricts cash transactions above €5,000 to encourage traceable, digital payments, a measure designed to reduce money laundering and tax evasion. If the amendment passes, individuals could legally conduct larger cash transactions without resorting to bank transfers or other formal mechanisms. Proponents cite the high cost of digital transaction fees for small vendors as one reason for loosening restrictions, arguing that cash remains an important tool for certain sectors of the economy. Critics, however, argue that relaxing the cap could reverse years of progress in promoting digital payment adoption, especially when cross-border trade and investment increasingly favour transparent, traceable financial systems.
Financial authorities have voiced concerns that raising the cash limit might complicate efforts to monitor financial flows and enforce anti-money-laundering standards. Banks and enforcement agencies typically rely on electronic transaction records to detect suspicious behaviour, and a higher threshold might create gaps in oversight. Opponents of the proposal warn that such a change would “reward tax evaders and illegal business,” arguing that large cash transactions have historically been linked to opaque economic activities.
ft.com
This policy dispute is also unfolding against a backdrop of broader economic and regulatory debates within the EU, where differing approaches to fiscal transparency and market oversight continue to shape national policies. For instance, some EU member states have adopted stringent digital transaction policies that support better tax compliance and enhanced competitiveness in global markets. Others, like Italy, face longstanding cultural and structural preferences for cash, which complicate harmonised policy implementation across the bloc.
For exporters and international firms operating in Italy, changes to cash transaction rules could have practical implications. Large cash transactions have historically played a role in certain sectors — including luxury goods, real estate, and small-scale trade — where digital infrastructure penetration is uneven. A higher cash limit might temporarily ease transaction friction in these niches, but it could also raise compliance costs and risk exposure for multinational businesses focused on supply-chain transparency and regulatory adherence.
At the same time, Italy’s broader economic strategy remains focused on regaining competitiveness in a challenging global environment. Policy debates of this nature — whether around cash limits, fiscal decentralisation, or regulatory reform — are part of an ongoing effort to balance domestic economic flexibility with the demands of international investors and markets. Articles addressing related issues such as fiscal powers, economic trends, and regulatory frameworks can be found in EBM’s coverage of European economic trends and reform, which explores how policy decisions affect competitiveness and growth trajectories across the continent.
