Strategic planning helps businesses manage risks, resources, and expectations in turbulent conditions. Today, its role is not limited to defining desired targets and year-end KPIs. It must also outline a clear roadmap for how decisions will be made when initial assumptions lose relevance within a matter of months.
For a significant share of companies, strategy is no longer about entering new markets or launching new products. It is about retaining key clients, maintaining pre-war volumes, and preserving operational stability. This is not a rejection of growth, but a conscious choice to first protect the foundation on which any growth is possible.
Within this logic, strategy focuses not on ambitious scenarios, but on the minimum sufficient conditions required to ensure business continuity. This approach allows companies to navigate turbulence without losing manageability.
From my own experience, annual strategies today are implemented, on average, at around 50%. This is not the result of management errors. It is a consequence of the number of external and internal factors that cannot be accurately accounted for at the planning stage.
Planning horizons
Join The European Business Briefing
New subscribers this quarter are entered into a draw to win a Rolex Submariner. Join 40,000+ founders, investors and executives who read EBM every day.
SubscribeOne of the key shifts in strategic planning is a sharp reduction in the lifespan of relevant information. Data on which business decisions are based often remains valid for only a few weeks or a single month.
Clients themselves operate within short planning cycles. Their production plans, budgets, and needs can change faster than a company’s internal documents are updated. As a result, strategy can no longer rely on long-term forecasts or fixed scenarios.
This fundamentally changes the logic of strategy. Instead of attempting to predict the future, businesses build systems for regular alignment with reality.
In this environment, an effective strategic model operates on several levels:
- The annual strategy defines core principles, key management decisions, and target reference points.
- Regular reviews on a semi-annual or quarterly basis allow plans to be adjusted in response to change.
- Operational decisions are made manually, based on the current situation, available information, and the company’s real capabilities.
As a result, strategy ceases to be a static document. It becomes an ongoing process that is continuously updated.
Decentralized approach: strategy bottom-up
One of the key practical insights is that strategy does not work when it is developed solely by the founder or a narrow group of executives. The most viable model is one in which each department takes responsibility for its part of the strategic vision.
Ahead of strategic sessions, teams prepare their own presentations: they review plan versus actual performance for the year, explain which targets were or were not achieved and why, and propose changes within their area of responsibility.
These presentations are discussed collectively. Colleagues ask questions, clarify assumptions, and challenge conclusions. It is within this internal debate that a realistic picture of the business emerges, rather than a set of abstract goals.
This approach has an additional effect: decisions developed within the team are perceived with greater commitment and are executed more effectively than those imposed top-down.
Once the strategy is aligned at the team level, it should be taken to the owners or the board for review. This is a separate governance stage that differs substantially from an internal strategic session.
At this level, strategy is assessed not from an operational perspective, but from the standpoint of responsibility for the business as a whole.Senior leadership:
- reviews the strategy’s core assumptions;
- assesses the realism of financial targets in the current market context;
- decides on acceptable levels of risk;
- sets priorities between growth, stability, and liquidity;
- defines the boundaries of operational flexibility.
Before final approval, the founder must answer a key question: to what extent does this plan reflect actual market conditions?
Pessimistic planning as a form of adaptation
Following the full-scale invasion in Ukraine, management expectations have fundamentally shifted. Businesses increasingly build plans based on pessimistic scenarios, deliberately underestimating forecasted results.
This is not about a loss of ambition or an avoidance of responsibility. It is a response to an environment in which optimistic forecasts are quickly undermined by external factors.
Pessimistic planning helps maintain control over finances, inventories, and risks. It reduces managerial stress and enables decisions based on real capabilities rather than desirable but unlikely scenarios.
In this sense, a pessimistic plan is not a sign of weakness, but a tool of strategic resilience.
Strategy does not guarantee the achievement of planned results. Its primary function is to ensure manageability, aligned expectations, and a shared understanding of reality.
Even a pessimistic but realistic plan allows a company to move forward systematically rather than react chaotically. In conditions of constant change, this systematic approach becomes a key competitive advantage.
A strong annual strategy today is a shared understanding of priorities, roles, and acceptable levels of risk. It enables a business to act consistently even when plans require regular adjustment.
